An Embarrassment to JFK Research

  This post intends to expose the tactics and personalities behind the Oswald Innocence Campaign once and for all, for the fraudulent and disingenuous bullies they are.  And after this post, will never be mentioned again, as they deserve no more attention from me or any other SERIOUS JFK researcher.
   I’d heard about Ralph Cinque and his buddies through listening to Jim Fetzer’s radio show and gave their articles a curious look. I’m open to new ideas and was intrigued by what was touted as the “greatest breakthrough in the JFK assassination.”
   Say hello to Ralph Cinque everybody…
image

He would really love for you to come visit his sprawling estate and pay almost $1000 a week to stay with him and learn how to not eat. In other words, you get nothing but a room and some healthy encouragement! Sounds great, but wait there’s more…Ralph would also like to sell you some Human Growth Hormone…
image

   I thought that was illegal…but what do I know? Simply amazing results Ralph, you look great! Maybe it’s because of all the vitamins, supplements, and natural remedies you sell…
image

Oh, I almost forgot, he is also a chiropractor, which allows him to make such keen observations of the way a person’s clothes fit on their body…oookay then….moving right along….The only reason I bring any of this up is just to illustrate the questionable credibility of this modern day snake-oil salesman. Wanting people to replace their prescription drugs for this non-FDA approved, god knows whats in this crap! If that doesn’t tell you all you need to know about this guy….wait there is more…his charming personality!
   Let’s see…in a few short sentences he managed to accuse me of being somebody else, an accesory to the murder of JFK, and having shit for brains.I also got the obligatory “fuck you mother fucker” only said in the kind doctor-like Cinque way.

image

And now we get to the meat and potatoes…the maniacal ravings of a lunatic who has no concept of logic…meet the cigar store indian….

image

Now, you might be saying what the …? My thoughts exactly…

image

He is trying to say that everyone in the picture is “showing emotion” except for Lovelady. Because this was faked and he was inserted later, don’t ya know! Everything I posted over there was deleted as soon as I posted it…because, well, he is the master and overlord of his domain and doesn’t want dissenting opinions expressed on his page…that’s fine, but is that the mark of true researcher?

image

Then I begged him to ban me…

image

Enough about this guy…but if you would like to read more about what a great guy Ralph Cinque is please check this guy’s blog out
http://ralphcinqueisastupidbitch.blogspot.com/?m=1 This is a great post that goes into more detail and insight on this guys antics.
    Moving on to the guy responsible for my initial disdain…The Captain…Richard Hooke. I don’t really have much to say about this guy other than he is a propaganda artist and thief. Want proof?

image

That is my original post, and a lil while later, over at his place…he takes all the credit for making a new discovery…

image

All he did was crop my pic and put a red circle on it…like nobody could tell where Lovelady was….For more entertaining reading on this guy…
http://richardmhookeisonedumbassfooke.blogspot.com/?m=1
From the same guy that brought us the Cinque blog.
And last but not least James H. Fetzer, the good doctor that teaches philosophy and scientific reasoning, yet doesn’t seem to practice any of it. Mr. Put up or Shut up says all kinds of things, mostly hot air, and loves to hear himself speak. You disrespect the memory of your good friend, legendary photo analyst Jack White. Bravo Jim, you think a snake-oil selling chiropractor made a great discovery, but for 50 years a brilliant photo analyst who actually studied the case somehow missed this? He didn’t….here is his take…
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?6252-Altgens-6-Case-for-Alteration
Now that Trask has established that there was no time for the Altgens to be altered (“it was on the wire in 20 min. to the entire world, we were proud of that…-Ike Altgens”) and appeared in papers the evening of the 22nd. And I am also pretty sure no Lovelady doubles were used (why?) that leaves only a couple of his statements to be useful…
1) “I doubt the man to be Oswald for many reasons”
2)A cut and paste job would be too complicated
3)After many years of study, MY results are inconclusive
4) If it is Lovelady, then it is much ado about nothing.
          Agreed Jack! Jim you should be ashamed of yourself for promoting the behavior of your little group with their personal attacks and vile manor. You are already that crazy “conspiracy theorist” the media loves to have on, incessantly rambling out your facts like a didactic robot…you make us all look bad. We are supposed to be searchers of the truth, not promoting every dim-wit theory that comes your way because nobody else will give them the time of day. Philosophize on that and use your logic and reasoning skills to figure out this a ridiculous theory based on manufactured evidence, not all the available evidence that proves Oswald coulf NOT have been in the doorway at this time. Jim also won’t return my e-mails now…(I think they may have got to him) For more fun facts on Jim Fetzer check out…

http://fetzerfollies.blogspot.com/?m=1
Same author as the last two blogs…I’m guessing they pissed of Joe Backes as much as me, well maybe more! Hopefully now that the truth of these shills is out for the world to see, we can all move on and continue as we were…Oh and one last parting shot….I think you might wanna up the dosage on your HGH there fella, I think the “effects” are wearing off!

image

Thanks for reading and please feel free to comment and share this blog with the world! 😉

**All images courtesy of Google**

Advertisements

25 thoughts on “An Embarrassment to JFK Research

  1. 735154 805611Id need to verify with you here. Which isnt 1 thing I often do! I get pleasure from reading a put up that will make individuals believe. In addition, thanks for permitting me to comment! 457563

  2. There are many reasons to suppose Lee stepped outside during the shooting, even apart from the photographic evidence, including that he was observed in and around the 2nd floor lunchroom at 11:50, Noon, 12:15 and as late as 12:25 by Carolyn Arnold, the executive secretary to the Vice President. The motorcade passed by at 12:30 and, within 90 seconds, Lee was confronted back in the lunchroom by Officer Marrion Baker and Roy Truly, his supervisor in the building.

    Both reported in their handwritten statements, which were published in The Warren Report, that he was not perspiring, not out of breath, not agitated, but was acting perfectly normally, where Truly added he was a bit startled, as anyone might be, to find himself confronted by an officer with a drawn revolver, who also wrote that he was drinking a coke.

    He would later be directed to strike that observation from his report, when they discovered there were too many problems with the time line and wanted to contract it. But with everyone else out in front of the building to watch Jack and Jackie drive by, why would anyone have remained in the lunchroom only a short distance from the doorway. I wouldn’t have. Would you?

    Only three candidates have ever been advanced to be Doorman: Lee Oswald, Billy Lovelady, and the man in the checkered shirt, who is clearly not Billy Lovelady. Doorman is about 5’10” tall, slender build and weights around 120 lbs. He is wearing a richly-textured, long-sleeved shirt, splayed open to his waist and a tee-shirt that appears to have been tugged at the neck. Compare him with the available alternatives:

    (h1) Lee Oswald was about 5’10”, of slender build, around 120 lbs and was wearing a richly-textured, long-sleeved shirt, splayed open to the waist and a tee shirt tugged at the neck.

    (h2) Billy Lovelady was 2-3″ shorter than Lee and 15-20 lbs heavier. He was wearing a short-sleeved, red-and-white vertically striped shirt, which he showed to the FBI on 29 February 1964.

    (h3) The man in the checkered shirt is lower in front of the Book Depository, outweights Doorman by at least 30 lbs and has his red-and-black checkered shirt buttoned up to the neck.

    We have published so much on this it is embarrassing that anyone contests our findings. See, for example, “JFK believe it or not: Oswald wasn’t even a shooter” by Richard Hooke or “The JFK War: The Challenging Case of Robert Groden”. Billy confirmed that he was in the doorway to the Warren Commission and told Jones Harris in person that he had been wearing the red-and-white vertically striped short-sleeved shirt. The FBI photographed him and sent a report back to FBI Headquarters affirming that this was the shirt he was wearing at the time.

    In addition, Lee told Homicide Detective Will Fritz that he was “out with Bill Shelley in front” at the time of the assassination? I was not implying that Lee was drinking a Coca Cola, but a coke in the generic sense of a soft drink, which was no doubt in a bottle at the time. You not only fail to deal with the photographic evidence but insist on a scenario that is actually compatible with his having been where he said he had been (out in front with Bill Shelley) and then come back inside for a coke, where Officer Baker confronted him. Have you bothered to look at the photographic evidence? I have published a lot about this:

    “JFK SPECIAL: Oswald was in the doorway, after all!” (with Ralph Cique)
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/01/25/jfk-special-oswald-was-in-the-doorway-after-all/

    “JFK SPECIAL 2: Oswald was in the doorway, after all!” (with Ralph Cique and Clare Kuehn)
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/04/13/jfk-special-2-oswald-was-in-the-doorway-after-all/

    “JFK SPECIAL 3: Oswald was in the doorway, after all!” (with Ralph Cique)
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/05/05/jfk-special-3-oswald-was-in-the-doorway-after-all/

    “JFK SPECIAL 4: Oswald was in the doorway, after all!” (with Richard Hooke)
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/06/11/jfk-special-4-oswald-was-in-the-doorway-after-all/

    “JFK SPECIAL 5: Oswald was in the doorway, after all!” by Ralph Cique (with Jim Fetzer)
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/06/12/jfk-special-5-oswald-was-in-the-doorway-after-all/

    “JFK believe it or not: Oswald wasn’t even a shooter!”
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/11/14/jfk-believe-it-or-not-oswald-wasnt-even-a-shooter/

    “JFK: 49 Years in the Offing: The Altgens reenactment” by Ralph Cinque
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/11/21/jfk-49-years-in-the-offing-the-altgens-reenactment/

    “The JFK Altgens6: Bill Shelley’s Shrunken Head” by Richard Hooke
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/19/the-jfk-altgens6-bill-shelleys-shrunken-head/

    “Newseum displays ‘Oswald’s Shirt’: Proof that he was Doorman” with Ralph Cinque and Richard Hooke
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/02/26/newseum-displays-oswalds-shirt-proof-that-he-was-doorman/

    “JFK: Why Buell Wesley Frazier was erased from Altgens6” with Larry Rivera
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/03/07/jfk-why-buell-wesley-frazier-was-erased-from-altgens6/

    “JFK: Lovelady’s ‘Arrow’ points to conspiracy and cover-up” with Ralph Cinque
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/03/16/jfk-loveladys-arrow-points-to-conspiracy-and-cover-up/

    • Much like your Sandy Hook questions, your initial queries have been answered if you take the time to look….You have not proven Lee Oswald was wearing the rust colored shirt at work that day…in his own words he states he changed his shirt and trousers when he arrived back at his rooming house…even Marion Baker wouldn’t say for sure that it was the same shirt. He and others state it was a light brown or khaki shirt…which was present in Oswald’s dirty laundry seen in the photo of evidence collected at the rooming house. Absolutely no one puts Lee Oswald on those front steps at anytime… Period. To prove that your guerilla Lovelady was a third person all together, you must establish who it was. Lovelady stated to the HSCA that the FBI never told him to wear the shirt he had on that day, it was just what he happened to be wearing when they picked him up…the phallacy was just an incompetent typing up the report…your theory has been thoroughly debunked by myself and others, and all you do is point to your problem filled articles. When you want to address the problems I have just stated, you are welcome back.

  3. Suppose we take your claim–that Lee changed his clothes–seriously. What is the chance that he would have chosen a shirt and an undershirt that look just like the one on the man in the doorway? That has to have a vanishing probability, especially when he is also the right height, weight and build to be Doorman. We know when he was arrested and taken into custody he was wearing a matching shirt and tee-shirt.

    Moreover, you have done nothing to show that Billy Lovelady or the man in the checkered shirt was the person we call “Doorman”. Billy is shorter and heavier and was wearing a short-sleeved shirt, while the man in the checkered shirt is much heavier and has it buttoned up to the top. Unlike Oswald, neither of them is a plausible candidate to have been Doorman. Good try, but you are playing readers for saps.

    • Here’s the proof Fetzer, Billy Love lady admitted it was him at least a half dozen times to the cops and FBI, under oath, and put it in writing to Robert Groden personally. The only people that can prove who was on those steps are the people we know were there…and there’s only one left. Bell Frazier….good luck with that. Your claims are exaggerated speculation at best with no real evidence to back it up except for fabricated and blurry images that Ralph and Dick cook up for you to exploit…move on to something else… The teet is dry on this.

  4. Billy was put under tremendous pressure. For you to be believe that, you would have to believe that someone who was about 5’7″ and weighed around 140-145 lbs who was wearing a short-sleeved, red-and-white vertically striped shirt could also be around 5’10” and weight about 120 lbs. I can’t believe you would pull this out of your ass when the proof is there in the photograph. I have spelled it out. Compare (h1) with (h2) and (h3). It’s not even close. And who would go to the FBI and show them the shirt they were wearing (short-sleeved and red-and-white vertically striped), which they photographed and sent to FBI Headquarters with confirmation that this was the shirt he had been wearing) if it was not the shirt he had been wearing? That would take a special kind of nut-job. But to change the words you later say about it to avoid being killed is another matter. I thought you might have some principles, but it’s obvious you are willing to ignore even very obvious proof to avoid admitting that you were wrong.

    • I’m not wrong….we’ve settled this long ago. I have said what I have to say, shown proof, evidence, and witness testimony that it was not Lee on the stairs. I stopped wasting my time with Ralph Cinque and the claims of the OIC six months ago…I probably have 30 posts alone refuting Ralph and the OIC’S claims…but hey, you are the star of some of my latest blog posts…feel free to defend yourself….”Oh my God…Clyde Forshaw is gonna assassinate me whilst wearing a kilt and oversized shoes!”

  5. You really are a shallow shit, aren’t you? The proof is internal to the photo, so you talk about anything else. I have proven that it was Lee in the doorway. You have simply denied it. No one should be taking you seriously. You are childish and immature and have no reasoning ability. How can Billy be Doorman when he is 2-3″ shorter and 15-20 lbs heavier and was wearing a red-and-white, vertically striped short-sleeved shirt? I see that you are embarrassed because you have made such an issue of this. But if you had any balls, you would admit you were wrong and that your attempts to belittle Ralph Cinque were misguided and infantile. But that is asking too much from someone as infantile and misguided as are you.

    • Me shallow? Ha! That’s rich coming from you! How can you determine someone’s height in a photo when a) You have no internal ruler and b) You don’t know exactly where Altgens is standing? C) You can’t determine a person’s weight from a photo…thats just idiotic. You use a misstatement in an FBI report some shitty underling typed up that Lovelady himself refuted and clarified? Oswald talked plenty on camera that weekend…he had the opportunity to say “I was out front watching the motorcade with Bill Shelley, Billy Lovelady, and good ole Buell, I couldn’t possibly have shot the President” …but he didn’t because HE WASN’T! Ralph deserves every vile and demeaning comment directed his way…he is a disgusting, Napoleon complex having, HGH sucking, lying piece of shit…

      • He told the Homicide Detective who was interrogating him that he had been out with Bill Shelley in front. He did that. He was working for the FBI as an informant, which was confirmed by Waggoner Carr, the Attorney General of Texas, who discovered almost immediately that he was an FBI informant, had informant number 179 and was being paid $200 a month right up to the time of the assassination, which explains the absurdity of the federal government claiming it cannot release the tax records of the alleged assassin of the President of the United States. You are a fraud.

      • I agree with everything except your first sentence…he did not do that…you are inferring the answer to a question we do not know… In the same Fritz interview it says 2nd floor lunchroom at the time of shots…that doesn’t fit your manufactured scenario so you go with the one you made up? He’d tell everybody in the interrogation room but not the world when they shoved a camera and microphone in his face? Your pathetic attempt to find the smoking gun and be the hero has failed miserably… why don’t you do something worthwhile and put some pressure on Buell Frazier to be asked the really hard questions so we can expose him for the lying fraud he is…

  6. Are you so ignorant you don’t know that the handwritten notes that Fritz took were released by the ARRB in 2007? I published them and a typed copy thereof in many of the articles I have published about this. So you are completely out of your depth. You have no idea what you are talking about. And for you to claim you can’t estimate the height and weight and build of a man by looking at a photograph is absurd. Are you also unable to tell if he is wearing a long-sleeved or a short-sleeved shirt? a richly-textured shirt or a red-and-white vertically striped shirt? a checkered shirt that is buttoned up to the neck vs. a long-sleeved, richly-textured shirt that is splayed open to the waist? Are you making such ridiculous claims?

    • I know about the notes…like I said they also say 2nd floor lunchroom time of shots and that he changed his shirt and trousers…you can’t just pick and choose what fits your theory and ignore what doesn’t…an honest researcher doesn’t operate like that. And like I said before, Josiah Thompson addressed the Lovelady/FBI shirt deal…and Lovelady himself stated they do NOT tell him to wear the clothes he was wearing that day. That shirt merely was what he happened to be wearing that day he met with the FBI. The FBI report is mistaken and it wouldn’t be the first time. And so are you…and it wouldn’t be the first time either…much like your Sandy Hook questions, these Lovelady questions have been answered if you just take the time to look instead of believing all the horseshit Ralph and Richard shovel your way…

      • So you not only don’t know the Fritz notes but don’t know that it states–right in the FBI report–that this was the shirt he was wearing at the time? I can’t believe you are so slovenly. And citing Josiah Thompson on any of this is completely indefensible. He has been undermining his own work in order to disavow “conspiracy” in the case of JFK by the 50th observance until I called him out on it. See “JFK, the CIA and The New York Times” for a thorough discussion of his efforts. What would have been the point of calling him in if it were not to have him show them the very shirt he had been wearing at the time? Otherwise, there is no point to it. It is embarrassing that you can’t do better. You don’t know your own ass about this.

      • I’ve cited you the goddamn Fritz notes…the FBI report was wrong and Lovelady himself cleared it up 40 years ago…when Thompson was more “conspiracy minded”. Lovelady had the plaid shirt and modeled it for two different photo shoots. That plaid shirt is an exact match to the shirt Lovelady was wearing…the best example is in the police station…using distorted stills from a video like you do is dishonest. There are others that show it IS Lovelady clearly and not your “guerilla man”…you just choose to be dishonest because it doesn’t fit your theory…the gig is up Fetzer, you’ve been exposed as a fraud…move on…maybe another Paul is Dead show? Hahaha

  7. You really are a phony and a fraud. There would have been no point in having Billy Lovelady come in to model whatever shirt he was wearing. I can’t believe you would think anyone could be so easily taken in. It states in the report, “He stated he was wearing a red and white vertically striped shirt and blue jeans”, which they photographed and sent to FBI Headquarters. How could he have been more explicit than that? And he told JFK researcher Jones Harris during a personal interview when Jones flew to Dallas to speak with him that that was the shirt he had been wearing. Why in the world would the FBI have bothered to photograph him in any other shirt? Do you think they were composing a photo album for Director J. Egar Hoover of different persons taken at random? I can’t believe you are shoveling shit and expecting anyone to take you seriously. Here is one of many articles in which we discuss the FBI report: http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/04/13/jfk-special-2-oswald-was-in-the-doorway-after-all/

    • He is clearly seen in other films and photos wearing a long sleeve plaid shirt…end of discussion…show me one picture of B.L. wearing a short sleeve vertically striped shirt that day and I’ll acquiesce…until then you lose… FRAUD!

  8. Yes, of course. He is also in the Altgens6 wearing a short-sleeved shirt, standing to the right of Doorman (as you view the photo) and to his left (from his point of view). He has his hands raised to protect his eyes from the Sun. I am surprised you don’t know the case any better than this. We have explained this dozens of times, including several of the article I have cited above, where Billy confirmed his location to Joseph Ball during the Warren Commission depositions. It’s embarrassing that you are holding forth as though you were an expert on the assassination, when you are actively participating in the cover up. See http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/03/16/jfk-loveladys-arrow-points-to-conspiracy-and-cover-up/ So we not only have the FBI photos and Billy’s confirmation to Jones Harris, but you can actually see him in the photo. I expect you to reiterate the attempts to conceal and suppress that information, of course, and to continue to deceive and mislead your readers. You are some piece of work.

  9. One point is undeniable about the Altgens 6 photograph: there are significant anomalies in this photo that should not exist in the work of a professional photographer like Ike Altgens. In turn, there are overwhelming contradictions throughout the body of evidence in the Kennedy assassination–medical, ballistic, eyewitness, and photographic/film. For this reason alone, a careful study of the Altgens photo is well worth our time. Any serious student of the JFK assassination should have an open mind to the points raised above by Professor Fetzer.

    • And any “researcher” putting forth their theory should be able to address the numerous evidentiary points I make refuting thier claims without resorting to underhanded tactics and repeating themselves incessantly telling me to go read this or that article…I’ve read them, I’m not the least bit intrigued or excited about any of them…like I’ve said a thousand times…Oswald in the Doorway is pure speculation based the weakest of arguments that when scrutinized, do not hold water…

  10. You have never dealt with these arguments, so your complaints ring hollow. You seem to think hot air is a substitute for rational exchange.
    There are many reasons to suppose Lee stepped outside during the shooting, even apart from the photographic evidence, including that he was observed in and around the 2nd floor lunchroom at 11:50, Noon, 12:15 and as late as 12:25 by Carolyn Arnold, the executive secretary to the Vice President. The motorcade passed by at 12:30 and, within 90 seconds, Lee was confronted back in the lunchroom by Officer Marrion Baker and Roy Truly, his supervisor in the building.
    Both reported in their handwritten statements, which were published in The Warren Report, that he was not perspiring, not out of breath, not agitated, but was acting perfectly normally, where Truly added he was a bit startled, as anyone might be, to find himself confronted by an officer with a drawn revolver, who also wrote that he was drinking a coke.
    He would later be directed to strike that observation from his report, when they discovered there were too many problems with the time line and wanted to contract it. But with everyone else out in front of the building to watch Jack and Jackie drive by, why would anyone have remained in the lunchroom only a short distance from the doorway. I wouldn’t have. Would you?
    Only three candidates have ever been advanced to be Doorman: Lee Oswald, Billy Lovelady, and the man in the checkered shirt, who is clearly not Billy Lovelady. Doorman is about 5’10″ tall, slender build and weights around 120 lbs. He is wearing a richly-textured, long-sleeved shirt, splayed open to his waist and a tee-shirt that appears to have been tugged at the neck. Compare him with the available alternatives:
    (h1) Lee Oswald was about 5’10″, of slender build, around 120 lbs and was wearing a richly-textured, long-sleeved shirt, splayed open to the waist and a tee shirt tugged at the neck.
    (h2) Billy Lovelady was 2-3″ shorter than Lee and 15-20 lbs heavier. He was wearing a short-sleeved, red-and-white vertically striped shirt, which he showed to the FBI on 29 February 1964.
    (h3) The man in the checkered shirt is lower in front of the Book Depository, outweights Doorman by at least 30 lbs and has his red-and-black checkered shirt buttoned up to the neck.
    We have published so much on this it is embarrassing that anyone contests our findings. See, for example, “JFK believe it or not: Oswald wasn’t even a shooter” by Richard Hooke or “The JFK War: The Challenging Case of Robert Groden”. Billy confirmed that he was in the doorway to the Warren Commission and told Jones Harris in person that he had been wearing the red-and-white vertically striped short-sleeved shirt. The FBI photographed him and sent a report back to FBI Headquarters affirming that this was the shirt he was wearing at the time.
    In addition, Lee told Homicide Detective Will Fritz that he was “out with Bill Shelley in front” at the time of the assassination? I was not implying that Lee was drinking a Coca Cola, but a coke in the generic sense of a soft drink, which was no doubt in a bottle at the time. You not only fail to deal with the photographic evidence but insist on a scenario that is actually compatible with his having been where he said he had been (out in front with Bill Shelley) and then come back inside for a coke, where Officer Baker confronted him. Have you bothered to look at the photographic evidence? I have published a lot about this:
    “JFK SPECIAL: Oswald was in the doorway, after all!” (with Ralph Cique)
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/01/25/jfk-special-oswald-was-in-the-doorway-after-all/
    “JFK SPECIAL 2: Oswald was in the doorway, after all!” (with Ralph Cique and Clare Kuehn)
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/04/13/jfk-special-2-oswald-was-in-the-doorway-after-all/
    “JFK SPECIAL 3: Oswald was in the doorway, after all!” (with Ralph Cique)
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/05/05/jfk-special-3-oswald-was-in-the-doorway-after-all/
    “JFK SPECIAL 4: Oswald was in the doorway, after all!” (with Richard Hooke)
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/06/11/jfk-special-4-oswald-was-in-the-doorway-after-all/
    “JFK SPECIAL 5: Oswald was in the doorway, after all!” by Ralph Cique (with Jim Fetzer)
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/06/12/jfk-special-5-oswald-was-in-the-doorway-after-all/
    “JFK believe it or not: Oswald wasn’t even a shooter!”
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/11/14/jfk-believe-it-or-not-oswald-wasnt-even-a-shooter/
    “JFK: 49 Years in the Offing: The Altgens reenactment” by Ralph Cinque
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/11/21/jfk-49-years-in-the-offing-the-altgens-reenactment/
    “The JFK Altgens6: Bill Shelley’s Shrunken Head” by Richard Hooke
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2012/12/19/the-jfk-altgens6-bill-shelleys-shrunken-head/
    “Newseum displays ‘Oswald’s Shirt’: Proof that he was Doorman” with Ralph Cinque and Richard Hooke
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/02/26/newseum-displays-oswalds-shirt-proof-that-he-was-doorman/
    “JFK: Why Buell Wesley Frazier was erased from Altgens6″ with Larry Rivera
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/03/07/jfk-why-buell-wesley-frazier-was-erased-from-altgens6/
    “JFK: Lovelady’s ‘Arrow’ points to conspiracy and cover-up” with Ralph Cinque
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/03/16/jfk-loveladys-arrow-points-to-conspiracy-and-cover-up/

    • I have addressed everything you put forth and have thouroughly debunked it…if you take the time to look, there are at least 30 other posts addressing the OIC claims…not just this one. As well as Joe Backes and BPete1969’s hard and more thourough debunking of your crap than mine. Yes my blog gets about 100 hits a day…with 40,000 hits just last year…your assertions of doorman’s t-shirt are a perfect example of this. Oswalds shirt likely wasnt torn, ripped, and stretched until his arrest scuffle and being manhandled by the DPD after his arrest…nobody had a vneck tshirt on…it is clearly a shadow in the Altgens…its a shadow til you prove its not a shadow…also you misconstrue Oswald’s weight…see my post The Emaciation of Lee Harvey Oswald that proves he was closer 150-160 lbs…nowhere in his adult life ever is Oswald recorded weighing 120 lbs….thats absurd…..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s